THE WORLD AS SCULPTURE
I'm sharing something that might be a source of amusement!
Erik Koed – Sculpture and The Sculptural
What I find interesting in this essay is the idea of
“sculpturality” as a quality.
The sculptural can be found in that which is not intended as
sculpture – as with the effects of nature’s elements – on a landscape as one
sweeping mass, or on individual objects of nature – like driftwood or weathered
rock.
It is when this organic use of “sculpturality” is
implemented by a sculptor in their work, that it carries the most appealing
plasticity.
Koed briefly touches on the idea of the plastique – I wish
he had expanded on this thought, as it is what I find to be the most tangible
definition of the sculptural in sculpture. It suggests a dynamic force, a
fluidity between sculpture and viewer, a connection with the plasticity in the
mind of the viewer, which is thus shaped in turn by viewing the sculpture.
Plasticity also extends to the dynamic shaping of space
itself – as an equal presence.
Koed quotes F David Martin’s idea of “enlivened space” – all
are in relationship – object, space and viewer.
Anthony Gormley – Reflection
I find myself resonating strongly with Gormley’s delivery in
this interview.
His ideas of being centered in the body, inhabiting the
body, then creating a representation of that body which inhabits a space really
make sense to me.
The fact that the marks from the mold are still present
actually seems to give the piece a sense of living rawness, as if that
sculpture-body itself possesses life.
I appreciate his distinction between the archetype and the
individual / subjective.
His idea of the subjective is not an alienating one, it is
representative of individuality and encourages the sense of individuality in the
viewer.
Jean Baudrillard – Simulations
My thoughts on this are a little fragmented – however, I
will do my best to communicate them!
In his comparison between the abstracted (and even the
represented) to the simulated,
Baudrillard seems to be saying that abstraction and representation still
give space and place to the REAL
(by describing it, or some quality of it) – whereas in a simulation, the
direct copy leaves nowhere for the imagination to go in order to consider the
qualities of the thing.
I find it interesting that this was written in the early
80s, well before the current virtual reality world where the lines between real
and simulated are almost ignored altogether. Of course it is still addressed as
a (maybe slightly outdated) ethical debate and there is still a sense that the
simulated is not quite the real thing but there is a resigned acceptance of the
fact.
Everything is considered as “some kind of real”.
And in the art world, the virtual or simulated has become
it’s own medium.
Marcus & Saka – Assemblage
I feel like I need the “Assemblage For Dummies” guide!
As this is my first foray into the subject, this text is
rather a weighty discussion to serve as an introduction. I get a sense from it
about HOW assemblage is USED – however, I am still not at all clear as to
exactly what it IS!
With the term being associated with the psychological /
philosophical / political writings of Deleuze & Guattari as well as to
describe a collage type of process deployed by many artists from the Dadaists
onwards, it appears to have many applications.