Sunday, December 14, 2014

END OF SEMESTER SUMMARY – DECEMBER 15 2014


END OF SEMESTER SUMMARY – DECEMBER 15 2014



LINKS:

First Year Proposal

Solo Sketches of Physical Exercises

Workshop Reports

Advisor Meeting Reports

Peer Critique Reports



STUDIO PRACTICE


Goals & Intentions

To develop, document and describe exercises in Physical Preparation (of body and mind) and Creative Response (in play and interaction) that are conducive to constructing the self as a versatile medium for performance.

To investigate methods of creating new work using these physical and creative tools.


Methods

I created a series of “Solo Sketches” to demonstrate my Physical Exercises.
These are presented as video documentation with accompanying instructional text.

I facilitated two series of workshops in Asheville NC, where I am based.
My “guinea-pig students” were members of Asheville Contemporary Dance Theater and the Asheville Butoh collective respectively. These workshops were process and feedback oriented.
I also facilitated a community workshop in Salisbury MD which was geared towards culminating in a public performance.
These workshops are presented in my blog as detailed reports of exercises with student feedback and my own observations – plus segments of video documentation.


Questions & Suggestions

From studio advisor Laura Gonzales:

“Where is the work?” Laura is always asking – challenging me to regard every aspect of what I am doing and ask “where is the art? where is the work here?” Can it be developed somewhere unexpected that I am not thinking of? The language used in describing the exercises, the video documentation, the presentation of a curriculum as well as the movement of the body, the intention of the exercises, the development of original performance pieces. “Where is the Art?”

From critique group peers:

Who is this curriculum for?
How will the resulting curriculum look?
How do I intend to utilize the four categories of: 1. Definition, History & Context, 2. Physical Preparation, 3. Creative Response, play & Interaction, 4. Assignments & New Work.

How am I integrating the underlying themes of my work as an artist (Transformation, Metamorphosis, Transcendence) into my pedagogy?

From workshop participants & crit group:

Alteration of “normal” conditions – a suggestion to perform exercises under altered conditions to help define the intention and intensify the physical and mental experience.
For example: alter clarity of vision in order to focus internally on the breath and on the connection with the earth for balance and stability.
And: perform exercises in an altered environment – such as under water, or even something as simple as music that contrasts the intention of the exercise.

When leading a workshop exercise, make sure my directions are clear and unambiguous. Lead students through each step and thoroughly introduce and explore each idea individually before combining different elements.

How can exercises be adapted to suit different ages, levels and abilities?

What relationship do these exercises have to Performance Art?

Concern about safety issues and risk of injury.

Is it necessary for the exercises to be so long?

Participants express a desire for social interaction – to be able to observe each other during individual movement exploration and also to include more interactive exercises.

From faculty in Berlin this summer:

Jean Marie Casbarian: What is your work about? Do you consider your practice as a pedagogical practice?

Andrew Cooks: What about your work is important to you?


Results & Conclusions

On the most part I feel satisfied with the results of this semesters studio work.
Ideally, I would like to have covered more ground in every aspect of the work. There are more Physical Preparation exercises I plan to develop and add to the “Solo Sketches” blog, as well as exploring them in a workshop setting to receive student feedback. There are also many more Creative Response exercises to explore in a workshop environment.
The main area I did not have the opportunity to make progress with is the creation of new work utilizing the tools provided through these physical and creative exercises. In order to accomplish this, it is necessary to work intensively with the same group of students for several sessions – which I was unable to do this semester. However, my studio advisor, Laura Gonzales, suggested that I can still accomplish this as a solo project, and that it would in fact be more beneficial to do so before bringing the method into a workshop situation.

Over all, the work that was accomplished feels very thorough, significant and cogent, and I can see a shape forming for what will become a practical and comprehensive pedagogy.



RESEARCH


Goals & Intentions

To study the chronological history of 20th century Performance Art.

To understand more about the role of performance in an anthropological context.

To investigate current pedagogical methods of Performance Art.


Methods

Reading:

RoseLee Goldberg – Performance Art: From Futurism To Present. Thames & Hudson, 2011. (completed)

RoseLee Goldberg – Performance: Live Art since 1960. Harry N Abrams Inc, 1998.
(completed)

Guillermo Gomez-Pena / Roberto Sifuentes – Exercises For Rebel Artists: Radical Performance Pedagogy.  Routledge, 2011. (completed)

Richard Schechner – Performance Studies: An Introduction. Routledge, 2013.
(still reading)

Nathan Stucky / Cynthia Wimmer – Teaching Performance Studies. Southern Illinois University Press, 2002. (still reading)

Victor Turner – The Anthropology Of Performance. PAJ Publications, 1988.
(still reading)

Michael Huxley / Noel Witts – The Twentieth-Century Performance Reader. Routledge, 2002. (still reading)

Online research:

Performance Art syllabi search of educational institutions.


Questions & Suggestions

From research advisor Laura Bissell:

Laura B sent me a suggested bibliography (which is included in Advisor Meeting Report 2)
As I am quite a slow reader, she suggested I search for specific articles once I have narrowed down my subject matter to key points of interest.

From studio advisor Laura Gonzales:

Laura G suggested I research all types of syllabi and curricula in order to grasp a comprehensive understanding of how they function and for insight into possibilities for presentation methods – then begin to structure my own.

She also suggested that the writing I have done in creating reports, instructions and descriptions for my studio work this semester might be of value to incorporate into my research paper.
A possible research paper topic might be on the subject of exactly how the exercises I am developing prepare the body and mind for performance.


Results & Conclusions

Reading RoseLee Goldberg’s performance art chronologies has really helped to gain a historic perspective and fill in some gaps for me.  The flow of how one artistic movement fed into another, due to key individuals, political influences and other radical changes in philosophy, psychology, art and fashion are all very apparent in her books. They also introduced me to artists I had previously had little or no knowledge of and who I will now continue to research.

The subject of Performance Studies is not one that I have researched in depth as a subject apart from artistic performance, although I have been aware of its concepts. I am currently reading Richard Schechner and Victor Turner plus a reader compiled by Nathan Stucky and Cynthia Wimmer. These viewpoints are providing me with insight on the roles of performance in society and in perceiving actions as performative – for the function of communication (in both humans and animals).

“Exercises For Rebel Artists” has truly delighted me! I could hear loud and clear the voices of Gomez-Pena and Sifuentes – their language feels very natural and familiar to me. I appreciate the fact that their pedagogy is a well-rounded method that leaves aesthetic choices to the individual. Even though their own artistic, social and political choices are so radical and provocative, their method is one that stands alone and does not necessarily dictate their own aesthetic results. This is exactly what I am aiming to achieve in my own pedagogical method.

So far my research time has been somewhat limited as my focus has been on producing and clearly communicating my studio practice work. However, the materials I have absorbed have been enriching and I look forward to more intensive study in the coming months.



GOING FORWARD

My goals for the immediate future are to follow up on “loose threads” still hanging from my Studio Practice semester. I would like to respond to questions that were posed to me by workshop participants, my peer group and Transart faculty.
I also want to complete a solo project to explore and demonstrate the use of my physical and creative exercises as tools in the creation of new work.

Going into the spring semester, I aim to research the possibilities of syllabus and curriculum formats and shape mine in a manner that feels most suitable for the work.
With the help of my research advisor Laura Bissell, I will formulate a research paper that supports and defends the intentions of my project.




Thursday, December 4, 2014

Critique Response 2 – November 21 2014


Critique Response 2 – November 21 2014

For my second peer group critique response, I asked my group to continue with giving me their overall impressions of my work over the semester – including the recent Physical Exercises, Workshop Sessions & also a workshop culminating in a public intervention performance as part of a downtown art-walk event.

One question that has arisen more than once (& posed again in this critique by Mark) is: Who is this pedagogy intended for?
The answer, in short, is: Anybody who has a body.
What is interesting to me is that, to most people with no formal background in dance or movement theater, it appears to be a method for dance professionals, teachers, choreographers etc – whereas – to dance professionals, it appears to be a “stripping away” of codified dance techniques & those who attended the workshops stated they find it very challenging to let go of their dance training in order to fully experience the natural & organic sense of the body in motion that these exercises approach. So, it seems to be perceived differently depending on the previous background of the perceiver!
Perhaps too, there is the visual influence of my demonstrations of the exercises in my Solo Sketches video series of the Physical Exercises – as I am obviously moving like someone who is dance trained – therefore it might be difficult for the untrained eye to distinguish the difference between the intention of the movement & the execution of the movement.
However, this has brought up the fact that I need to present a clear definition as to how & why & in what way this method of exploring the body & it’s capacities is for everyone & anyone – aswell as it’s value in the preparation of “Self” as a medium for Art.

Robyn & Lindey both recognized potential for incorporating much of what I am developing into a therapeutic or meditational context, as they both have experience of teaching & facilitating this kind of work – from children with ADD to senior citizens.  I also can envision the compatibility of using this work in a therapeutic context – however, if I were to specifically pursue this vein I would want to collaborate with a trained professional who has a deeper understanding of the clients needs & behavioral issues than I do.

Robyn also brought up something that some of my workshop participants have encouraged - & that is the idea of executing the physical exercises in a situation where there is some kind of counter-active or alternative environment which serves to heighten awareness of the body performing a particular function by providing some kind of resistance or alteration.
Examples of this are: Doing the exercises in water, wearing heavily padded clothing, using music that is the polar opposite in mood to the quality of motion, with earplugs, with glasses that distort vision.

O’Neill & KJ both commented on my development as a teacher … not only in the creation of a pedagogy but also in how I adapt due to considering the responses of the students. (This is exactly why I am developing this pedagogy through workshop situations – because pedagogy does not exist in a vacuum – it is in relationship to those receiving & utilizing it .. )
& Mark commented: “I appreciate how you have repositioned the body of the student as the authority. This is empowering and accurate.”

Gabriel focused his comments on the public intervention performance entitled “Attack of the Killer Stripey Tubes!” – noting the irony of the ominous alien invasion b-movie type title to the rather awkward, humorous, gumby-like characters the performance consists of!
(& actually, the full title of the piece is “Attack of the Killer Stripey Tubes! – who are actually quite friendly & not very scary at all”)
However there are some subtly disturbing undertones created whenever there is a distortion of the human form – so the humour is based on this dis-comfort.
I have used this movement installation in a variety of formats in the past – in a storefront window, on a trolley tour. Gabriel suggested doing it in a super-market & I had already thought about how I would love to do a guerilla public intervention of it at Wal-Mart!!!


Link to shared group google document:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/14uFhuZoa5nh3DWav1HSdr5WZgF0LTFKBY9ivx-5ikJg/edit?usp=sharing